TPO31-task1
The reading claims that a fossil skeleton of a dinosaur included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones showing that they are feathers. then, the reading passage claims that critics have contrasted the idea that this kind of dinosaur had feathers and provides three reasons for supporting. The lecturer, meanwhile, refutes all the reasons and put forth the idea that these reasons are unconvincing.
First, the reading passage’s author declares that the fine lines might not show the feathers and they may display the structures which were formed after the animal’s death. The reading then mentions the fine lines may represent the skin which have decomposed into fibers. However, the professor disagrees and mentions that based on the observations of other fossils of nearing animals, these remains could be feathers. The professor base her claim on the fact that functional structures of the nearing animals’ fossils were found which were not decomposited. thereby, these remaining fossils are definitely the feathers.
Second, while the reading passage declares that it is difficult to find out the exact part of the animal by fine lines and the remnant parts could be the frills rather than the feathers, the lecturer refutes this claim by saying that there is an important chemical difference between feathers and frills. The professor strongly says that the composition containing protein and baby cratine represents the definite proof for being a feather of this kind.
Finally, in contrast to reading passage claiming that the feathers are located along the backbone and tail of the animal and also most of the animals use them for flying or regulating the internal temperature, the lecturer strongly states that the feathers are possibly used by the dinosaurs for attracting the mates. then, the professor says that this kind of feathers are located in the backbone of the animal and this could be the reason. also, professor states that based on the analysis they made on the feathers, they are colorful in orange and white, thereby the feathers were used for displaying to the mates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...l bones showing that they are feathers. then, the reading passage claims that critic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that these reasons are unconvincing. First, the reading passage's author...
^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thereby
...were found which were not decomposited. thereby, these remaining fossils are definitely...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...the dinosaurs for attracting the mates. then, the professor says that this kind of f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...he animal and this could be the reason. also, professor states that based on the ana...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, while, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2514619883 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62147018811 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4211338639 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367212620902 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14025274017 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701768702907 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218578808453 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729070483624 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.