TPO35-INTEGRATED
The reading passage mentions to real origin of a handwritten manuscript book which was wrote in the fifteenth and sixteenth century and became famous by a bookseller, Wilfrid M.Voynich in 1912. While the reading uses three theories to more clarification about value and origin of debated book, the professor repudiates the mentioned theories by reading passage.
In the first place, the professor says that first theory which refers to scientific part of book and found some material similarities among Anthony Ascham’s book and Voynich’s manuscript is not analogous with fact. In the other words, Ascham who was a typical physicians, couldn’t able to create resourceful concept and ideas that there is in the Voynich’s manuscript. Furthermore, examples like little herbal that consists of ordinary plants is another reason to reject this theory due to lack of scientific level coordination between two books.
Secondly, lack of beneficial information and meaningless text make second theory which clarifies this theory by referring to Kelley who originated a special manuscript to earn money by illustrating his book as a magical one in seventeen century. However, the lecturer argues second theory because Voynich didn’t need to defraud the people with elaborated worked book. if he’s intention was tricking the people rudimentary words and sentences were enough.
Thirdly, the professor explains his disagreement about third theory which claims that Voynich was familiar with old manuscript book and his manuscript was a created book instead of original one. In the professor’s opinion modern technology confirm the date base on the ink. So, any claims like that can be easily rejected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mentions to real ori...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...a handwritten manuscript book which was wrote in the fifteenth and sixteenth century ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Voynich
...ecame famous by a bookseller, Wilfrid M.Voynich in 1912. While the reading uses three t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntioned theories by reading passage. In the first place, the professor says t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'physician'?
Suggestion: physician
...e other words, Ascham who was a typical physicians, couldn't able to create resourcef...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...level coordination between two books. Secondly, lack of beneficial information...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... his book as a magical one in seventeen century. However, the lecturer argues second th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...the people with elaborated worked book. if he's intention was tricking the pe...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary words and sentences were enough. Thirdly, the professor explains his disa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58174904943 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02030888402 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8408695881 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.