TPO4
The reading specifies that there are three main reasons to support the idea that dinosaurs were endotherm. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and brings up three reasons to reject the specific points made in the reading passage.
First of all, the author asserts that dinosaurs’ fossils have been found in polar region. On the other hand, only animals which can adapt their body temperature with the environment can survive there. Nevertheless, the lecturer states it is possible dinosaurs migrated in cold seasons to warmer climates or they may be hibernated during the winter.
Second, based on the reading, leg position of dinosaurs is under their body like all endotherms. Actually, they need this position to do some physical activities. While the lecturer brings up the idea that position leg can be due to their high weights. In this position, legs can support more weights and it is not necessarily related to being endotherm.
Third, the reading proposes that dinosaurs have some structures in their bodies called Haversian canals which are exclusive to the endotherms. However, the lecturer asserts that dinosaurs have different growth rate in different seasons, whereas, endotherms have the same growth rate in cold and warm weather.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...osition to do some physical activities. While the lecturer brings up the idea that po...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...necessarily related to being endotherm. Third, the reading proposes that dinosau...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27230046948 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6334638631 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3191358716 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5833333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.