TPO40
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether human can live on Venus planet or not. The reading states impossible to create a human life there because of high atmospheric pressure, the lack of water and oxygen and little sunlight. However, the lecture says that human can establish some stations on Venus in order to maintain a permanent human presence.
Atmospheric pressure is the first problem. According to the reading, atmospheric pressure on Venus is about 90 times more than at Earth, then it is almost impossible to survive in this pressure. In contrast, the professor refutes this statement by saying, human are able to create their home not on the surface of Venus, but on the high height. Therefore, atmospheric pressure is relating to the height that it makes possibly to establish human station.
In addition, water and oxygen resources is crucial for human. The reading says that there is not water reservoir on Venus and also the planet's atmosphere is only carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. The speaker points out that we can produce water and oxygen by using these materials and based on the chemical processes. Thus, these substances are not only bad things but also are very valuable.
Finally, very little sunlight arrived to the planet. The passage says that only 40 percent of the sunlight reaches to the Venus and it is not enough to produce electricity there. The professor, on the other hand, states that clouds are not very thick and it is sufficient to produce electricity by using solar cells.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...t water reservoir on Venus and also the planets atmosphere is only carbon dioxide and s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9766536965 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51411856108 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517509727626 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2440705918 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3571428571 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359550006686 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121334245674 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429745959289 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208725286349 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165290862576 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.