tpo41
Both the reading and lecture are about coal ash- a waste product of burning coal-. The United State has suggested some strict rules for controlling this harmful substance to preserve the environment. The article provides three reasons why companies disagree with these rules and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of them unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that such rigid rules have already been in the country. For instance the companies have to apply a special material which is called liner and prevent from leaking coal ash to soil, water and environment; hence, they must employ liner in new ponds and landfills. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that nowadays, those mentioned rules are not sufficient. For instance, liner has just been used in new landfills; however, the old ponds fail to take advantage of this situation and the coal ash can leak into water and soil again.
Secondly, the article contends that these laws can jeopardize the recycling procedure of coal ash because some building materials such as brick are being obtained through power plants; therefore, the offered rules can reduce consumers of recycled coal ash products due to fear; in the contrast, the professor believes that there are a huge number of strict rules for other materials like mercury. This toxic substance has being controlled for many years and it has its own consumers because its handling is safe and accurately.
Finally, the reading passage states that the cost of disposal and controlling of this plan can be very expensive for power companies; consequently the price of electricity will rise up.; conversely, the lecturer expresses that it is true but it is worthwhile in using these rules, because if consumers start buying the handled coal ash products, the cost of electricity will be trivial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ith these rules and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08888888889 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56557043861 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.436154723 49.2860985944 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06452816374 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455534208981 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145563728982 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124599170474 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264194437243 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388166037239 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.