TPO48 Integrated Writing
The passage states that the frog population is in danger of severe declination and it leads to some harmful effects for human such as increasing disease-carrying insects which frogs eat them. The article proposes some strategies to save frog population but the lecturer claims that these methods are not useful and refutes each of them.
First, the article avers that by restricting the usage of pesticides in corn and sugarcane farms, the harmful effects of these chemical compounds will be eliminated and frogs will be saved. The professor does not confirm this explanation by saying that farmers rely on these pesticides and not using of these substances leads to severe crop loss and a great cost impact for them. thus, it is not fair in comparison to farmers of other regions.
Second, the passage states that the main reason of declination in frog population is fungas infection so frogs will be saved by medical treatment. The lecturer refutes this remedy as well. she says that this treatment is not practical because each frog should be captured and treated individually. Furthermore, the medication is not communicable and next generations must be cured separately.
Third, the passage claims that limiting the excessive water use of lakes and wetland will conserve the natural habitat of frogs thus they population will be increased again. The professor avers that declination in water level of lakes and wetlands have an other important reason. she adds that global warming is the major reason and limiting the water usage by human activities will not be influential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... loss and a great cost impact for them. thus, it is not fair in comparison to farmer...
^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...e lecturer refutes this remedy as well. she says that this treatment is not practic...
^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... water level of lakes and wetlands have an other important reason. she adds that global ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...etlands have an other important reason. she adds that global warming is the major r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, second, so, third, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15891472868 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73063322162 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1844690285 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376988761744 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13276357507 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105198317683 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238143640648 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704297148833 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.