The reading asserts some reasons to explain the song of a unique whale who produces noises in an unusual frequency of 52 hertz which is higher than the normal whales' pitch. The lecturer, however, finds the theories dubious and casts doubts on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that this 52-hertz could be a hybrid so it is reasonable if it has a unique song because of its combined features of different species. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is a small chance that this whale could be a hybrid according to its migration patterns. Hybrid whales and non-hybrid ones would migrate together and follow the same migration pattern; nevertheless, this whale does not migrate with other and migrate alone.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that this unique whale may be deaf; hence it could not hear and learn other whales' songs. on the contrary, the professor underlines that it has a high pitch which could be defined as a physical structure of the throat; therefore, it would be unusual to consider this whale deaf because in fact typically the hearing ability and pitch have no connection.
Finally, the reading asserts that this whale may be only a member of a rare or an extinct species. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that there is some high-tech equipment that has been used for decades to hear whales' sounds. since this whale must have at least parents of its own species, the scientists should have heard this high pitch sound before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that this 52-hertz could ...
^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... not hear and learn other whales songs. on the contrary, the professor underlines ...
^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...used for decades to hear whales sounds. since this whale must have at least parents o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, at least, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8446969697 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43757872892 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7645881542 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06452816374 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512257214094 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210841670153 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957035204888 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304971029478 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159808262895 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.