transient lunar phenomena
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss about transient lunar phenomena, which is observed variety colors of areas on the Moon. In the lecture, however, the professor casts doubt on the hypothesis about the issue, which are described in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage argue that one cause of the phenomena is emitting gas. Gas which come from the beneath the surface of the lunar are the factor that affect changing colors while the lecture indicates that this hypothesis is not true, in other words, gas is not the factor that affect changing colors. To be more specific, according to lecture, gas not emitted near the TLP sites and due to it's too small, gas can't be seen in the Earth.
Secondly, in contrast to the claim of the reading that dust floating above the moon's surface is the one reason by reflecting the light, the professor insist that dust can't cause of the TLPs. To be more particular, little dust can't affect to the phenomena and people who reached Moon found that dust is too flat, so it can't reflect light.
Finally, according to the reading passage, solar radiation is one possible reason of TLPs. However, the lecturer maintains that it is debatable due to insufficient data. With more detailed, according to observation data, comparing data of the phenomena and TLPs data are sometimes match but not match many times. So, he think it's not correlation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the beneath the'. Did you mean 'beneath the'?
Suggestion: beneath the
...na is emitting gas. Gas which come from the beneath the surface of the lunar are the factor tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...TLP sites and due to its too small, gas cant be seen in the Earth. Secondly, in con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e light, the professor insist that dust cant cause of the TLPs. To be more particula...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...LPs. To be more particular, little dust cant affect to the phenomena and people who ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...Moon found that dust is too flat, so it cant reflect light. Finally, according to t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...Moon found that dust is too flat, so it cant reflect light. Finally, according to t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'matched'.
Suggestion: matched
...e phenomena and TLPs data are sometimes match but not match many times. So, he think ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
... match but not match many times. So, he think its not correlation.
^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... but not match many times. So, he think its not correlation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83884297521 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41882416351 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50826446281 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.4240538367 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06452816374 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157193353326 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669183437691 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101120906465 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954225115163 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073233430682 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.