The reading and the lecture are both about a phenomenon called the Transient Lunar Phenomena or TLP, which is a short flash of light that seems to stem from the surface of the Moon. While the author of the reading passage suggests some reasons for the creation of TLP, the professor frowns upon all these reasons. He states that none of the reasons proposed by the writer explains the TLP. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points mentioned in the article by providing three controversial reasons.
In the reading passage, the writer begins by saying that the flaws in the telescopes might account for TLP. However, the professor refutes this idea. He asserts that if the observation of TLP was because of defects in telescopes, the TLP would be observed randomly and in arbitrary locations on the Moon. But, all the reports and evidence have shown that TLP only has been seen in two specific locations on the Moon.
Furthermore, according to the article, meteors' strike to the Moon can be the reason for TLP. On the other hand, the professor points out that the light or the flash produced by meteors' collision can be observed for few seconds, not for the time spell of twenty minutes, which is the time length that some TLP has been seen. Besides, meteoric showers cannot be blamed for TLP since no TLP has been reported at the same time that meteoric showers have happened.
Finally, the author believes that the reflection of the sunlight on some rocks of the Moon can cause TLP. Not surprisingly, the professor repudiates this assertion by contending that we can see the Moon at night because of the reflection of the sunlight. It is impossible to see the TLP while you can see the Moon since the reflected light from the Moon is much brighter than the reflected light from a bunch of rocks.
To sum up, both the lecturer and the author hold conflicting views on the main reasons that are responsible for the formation of TLP.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'meteors'' or 'meteor's'?
Suggestion: meteors'; meteor's
...that the light or the flash produced by meteors collision can be observed for few secon...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46394351013 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472140762463 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8580538657 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304897054248 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979308850461 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757653128195 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159755488733 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507871861747 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.