tv
The reading and the lecture are both about the television appearances of professors. The author of the reading feels that television apperances are benificial. The lecturer, however, challenges these explanations and provides few reasons of support.
To begin with, the passage posits that television appearances enhances the professor importance as scholar. The lecturer, nevertheless refutes this point by saying that TV appearances tend to create a bad image among fellow teachers. They may think that the professor is more in to entertainment rather than educatation, so it affects the professor funding for research.
Secondly, the author asserts that, Tv appearances of professor improves college reputation, which in turn leads to more donations for the university.Again, the lecturer opposses this by claiming that inorder to prepare for TV apperances, professor should prepare so well and it is time waste as he has to prepare what to talk, how to look and how to dress. He goes on and says that, instead professor can use this time in meeting students and doing research. Which actually benifits the university.
Thirdly, the author asserts that from TV appearances, public will also gain benifits, but the lecurer strongly disagrees this by stating that televisions do not require indepth knowledge on any topic. It just needs some background information. Furthermore, the brief information which public needs can be provided even by a reporter with little home work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t television apperances are benificial. The lecturer, however, challenges these exp...
^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...ds to more donations for the university.Again, the lecturer opposses this by claiming...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in meeting students and doing research. Which actually benifits the university. Thir...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44155844156 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02724644856 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.6282222437 49.2860985944 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165115813128 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441993786522 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771530057362 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898089624464 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554162293894 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.