tv appearances
The reading and the lecture are both about the television appearances of professors. The author of the reading feels that television appearances are beneficial. The lecturer, however, challenges these explanations and provides few reasons for support.
To begin with, the passage posits that television appearances enhance the professor's importance as a scholar. The lecturer, nevertheless, refutes this point by saying that TV appearances tend to create a bad image among fellow teachers. They may think that the professor is more into entertainment rather than education, so it affects the professor funding for research.
Secondly, the author asserts that Tv appearances of professors improve college reputation, which in turn leads to more donations for the university. Again, the lecturer opposes this by claiming that to prepare for TV appearances, a professor should prepare so well and it is time waste as he has to prepare what to talk, how to look and how to dress. He goes on and says that instead professor can use this time in meeting students and doing research, Which benefits the university.
Thirdly, the author asserts that from TV appearances, the public will also gain benefits, but the lecturer strongly disagrees with this by stating that televisions do not require in-depth knowledge on any topic. It just needs some background information. Furthermore, the brief information which public needs can be provided even by a reporter with little homework.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... television appearances are beneficial. The lecturer, however, challenges these exp...
^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...that television appearances enhance the professors importance as a scholar. The lecturer, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39224137931 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97844203802 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599137931034 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9653388741 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259376908094 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965295116364 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980956786342 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151585570286 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584777032186 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.