The United Kingdom (Sometime referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology—dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts—was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain’s population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most important sites but which left hundreds of other interesting projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reduction in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers as an amateur
The reading passage and the lecture are about British archaeology.More specifically, in the passage, the writer identifies three problems from the study.The lecturer is quick to outline the measures to resolve these troubles.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states that large numbers of works of art have been destroyed by the construction projects, thereby rendering archaeology unsearchable.The lecturer stands in firm opposition to this notion.He states that the program requires inspection of the construction site, and if there are relics, it must be preserved so the artwork can be stirred.
Secondly, the writer feels that archaeology has long been supported by government financial support ,which has resulted into only a few important relics being, and a large number of relics have not been studied, and a government financial support has been reduced from time resulting in money archaeology.Again, the speaker addresses the point when he states the program requires the construction company to bear the full cost of inspecting and maintaining the remains, so it provides a new source of funding for the archaeology community.
Finally the author brings his argument to close by suggesting that there are few professional job opportunities in the archaeology field, which has led many professionals to choose other jobs or participate in archaeology has an amateur.Not surprisingly, the lecturer rebutted this claim by contending that the programs has created many jobs, so there are more professionals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: More
...e lecture are about British archaeology.More specifically, in the passage, the write...
^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...dentifies three problems from the study.The lecturer is quick to outline the measur...
^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...reby rendering archaeology unsearchable.The lecturer stands in firm opposition to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e.The lecturer stands in firm opposition to this notion.He states that the progra...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...ands in firm opposition to this notion.He states that the program requires inspec...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...upported by government financial support ,which has resulted into only a few impor...
^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... only a few important relics being, and a large number of relics have not been studied, and a gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...died, and a government financial support has been reduced from time resulting in ...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...rom time resulting in money archaeology.Again, the speaker addresses the point when h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaker addresses the point when he states the program requires the construction co...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...nding for the archaeology community. Finally the author brings his argument to close...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Not
...rticipate in archaeology has an amateur.Not surprisingly, the lecturer rebutted th...
^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogy has an amateur.Not surprisingly, the lecturer rebutted this claim by contendi...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bs, so there are more professionals.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57446808511 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25036753154 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 58.0 21.2450331126 273% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.775164952 49.2860985944 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 327.5 110.228320801 297% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 58.75 21.698381199 271% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 4.19205298013 334% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559903578773 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332925524253 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00964766215863 0.0662205650399 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332925524253 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00964766215863 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.2 13.3589403974 256% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 4.15 53.8541721854 8% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.1 11.0289183223 246% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.42419426049 128% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 25.2 10.498013245 240% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.