In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1988, forest fires in Yellowstone, the most famous national park in the country, burned for more than two months and spread over a huge area, encompassing more than 800,000 acres. Because of the large scale of the damage, many people called for replacing the “let it burn” policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. Three kinds of damage caused by the “let it burn” policy were emphasized by critics of the policy.
First, Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park’s trees and other vegetation. When the fires finally died out, nearly one third of Yellowstone’s land had been scorched. Trees were charred and blackened from flames and smoke. Smaller plants were entirely incinerated. What had been a national treasure now seemed like a devastated wasteland.
Second, the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Many smaller species were probably unable to escape. There was also concern that the destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chains would make it impossible for the animals that survived the fire to return.
Third, the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. With several thousand acres of the park engulfed in flames, the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of visitors decided to stay away. Of course, local businesses that depended on park visitors suffered as a result.
Both the reading and the speech discuss about forest fires and the "let it burn" policy. The reading implies that the policy should not let the fires burn itself. however, the speaker strongly disagrees and thinks forest fire a natural ecological cycle.
First, the reading tells a story about the forest fire in 1988, giving some figure about the damages. Instead, the speaker disagrees. To be more specific, she argues that all the others fires are not as huge as this times. also, the heat from the fire can have the positive effect of for plants to reproduct.
Secondly, the passage says that wildlife, habitats and food chains will be destructed by uncontrolled fires. however, the professor strongly denies the article. Although the trees are be destroyed, small vegetation under trees have opportunities to gain the sunlight and become more flourish. After that, small animals will come again, causing the stronger food chains.
Finally, the reading mentions that the forest fire compromises the value of the park and decrease tourists. But the professor contradicts the article. Actually, the fire will not occur each year and become a big problem to the local economy.
In conclusion, the professor significantly refutes the three ideas about forest fire in the paragraphs. she states that the fire is part of nature process and will not affect economy a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the speech discuss ...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...y should not let the fires burn itself. however, the speaker strongly disagrees and thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fire a natural ecological cycle. First, the reading tells a story about t...
^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...argues that all the others fires are not as huge as this times. also, the heat fr...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ll the others fires are not as huge as this times. also, the heat from the fire can...
^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...s fires are not as huge as this times. also, the heat from the fire can have the po...
^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive effect of for plants to reproduct. Secondly, the passage says that wildl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ll be destructed by uncontrolled fires. however, the professor strongly denies the arti...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ies the article. Although the trees are be destroyed, small vegetation under trees...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... causing the stronger food chains. Finally, the reading mentions that the ...
^^^
Line 10, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood chains. Finally, the reading mentions that the forest fire compromise...
^^
Line 10, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome a big problem to the local economy. In conclusion, the professor signific...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...as about forest fire in the paragraphs. she states that the fire is part of nature ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50175247219 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582222222222 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1681066779 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.75 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0625 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206038241416 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065154505317 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731051944035 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115907350189 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102649148848 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.