The reading and the lecture are both about farming tuna in cages to enhance their numbers then sell them. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the issues that facing farming tuna. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that reserchers found new soultions to dael with these issues.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states female tuna can not lay eggs in cages. As aresult, farmers need to catch enormous nnmber of wild tuna. The article mentions that this procedure will affect and reduce tuna in the ocean. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that scientists found a hermon that can inject to female tuna which can not make any effect on either tuna's health or the consumers. Additionally, he points out that using this hermon tuna's population will not decline.
Secondly, the author suggests farming tuna is costly because tuna's diet depends on protein which excluded from other fish. In the article, it is said that indivisual tuna needs 70 kilograms everday of food. Again, the professor specifcally addresses this point when he states tuna took protein not only from fish, but also from other types pf plants. He goes on to say that palnts can provide tuna with protein in low cost. Consequently, the cost of producing tuna will not raise.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that in cages tuna can infest by parasite, that affect tuna and decrease their growth. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that scientists asserted that blood vessels can reduce by moving tuna the deepest water instead of put them on the offshore. He notes that because the resources the needed to live blood flukes absense in the deep water this disease will stop.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tunas'' or 'tuna's'?
Suggestion: tunas'; tuna's
...which can not make any effect on either tunas health or the consumers. Additionally, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94174757282 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36826878083 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2569880545 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259926803475 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087532139289 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573791749411 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161443884256 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300370064584 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tunas'' or 'tuna's'?
Suggestion: tunas'; tuna's
...which can not make any effect on either tunas health or the consumers. Additionally, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94174757282 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36826878083 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2569880545 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259926803475 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087532139289 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573791749411 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161443884256 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300370064584 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.