Both the reading and the lecture discuss about international fund to protect the forest in developing countries. The reading mentions three advantages that will happen due to the fund. In other hand, the lecture contradicts each points that are presented in the reading.
To begin with, the reading asserts that the fund will help agricultural areas. It will prevents some industries to damage and intterupt that area. However, the lecture says that in spite of saving the environment, cultivating field will damage it. Nowadays, the population is increasing rapidly so it will need more area to plant foods which more forest will be change to become agricultural field. Moreover, farmer will use pesticide that can pollute the water.
Next, the fund will go directly to government, instead of villagers and tribal residents. This will not guarantee that the fund will be used effectively like mentioned in the reading. The fund itself will be allocated for health services and education for the residents.
Last, the professor refutes the idea that the fund will help maintain the biodiversity. He doubts the fund will be used for planting economical products. This will decrease the forest biodiversity because the products often a single species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'prevent'
Suggestion: prevent
...d will help agricultural areas. It will prevents some industries to damage and intterupt...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.295 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72576136153 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.694187127 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.6428571429 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2857142857 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220220952672 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807135771603 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406903302739 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137693864101 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00549155553574 0.0443174109184 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.