x

Essay topics:

x

The article states that communal online encyclopedia have many drawbacks that make them much less valubale than traditional encycolpedias and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that communal online have many advantages that woutweigh its disadvantages and the critisims have made by the author’s is prejudice . And she he refutes each of the author’s reasons.

First, the reading avers that unlike the traditionl encyclopedias, contributors to onlince encyclopedia often lack academic creditionals, and thereby the inforamtion inaccurate. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this point by saying even if in tradionial way, errors could have been happened. Its too hard to do a comprehensive study on any subject without making errors. The professor adds that in case of making errors in communal online encyclopedia is easy to correct it, but if you made an erro in printing forms, it would take decades to be cprrected. So, the communal online encycopedia is much more better than the traditional ones.

Second, the article claims that the communal online gives users and vandels ot hacker the oppotunity to fabricate, delete, and corrpt information in the encycolpedia. However, the professor opposes this point by explaining that the poeple in charing of the comunal online encycopedias know the importance of protecting information un the encycopedia. So, the create two startegies that help them presereve crucial important facts from being damaged. The first strategy, is by creating read format only, so the users would not have the option to do any change on these facts. And secondly, they hire special editors to monitor all changes that have been made on the encyclopedia and clear them if malcious. The prfessor concludes that the onlines communal encyclopedia information is protecting from vandelism.

Third, the reading posits that the communal create a false impression of what information is important or unimportant by focusing too fretuently on popular topics. The professor refutes this point by stating that since the traditional encyclopedias have limited space, people judgement on sepcific topics that would not be popular among a wide range of people. But for online encycopedia, it could repressent academic subjects, and a great variety of topoic too. As a result, it create large diversity for all users. The professor concludes this create diversitication is a strong advantage for online communal encycopedia.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e made by the author's is prejudice . And she he refutes each of the author&a...
^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...the communal online encycopedia is much more better than the traditional ones. Second, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing information un the encycopedia. So, the create two startegies that help them presereve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any change on these facts. And secondly, they hire special editors to monitor all...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmunal create a false impression of what information is important or unimportant ...
^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gement on sepcific topics that would not be popular among a wide range of people....
^^
Line 7, column 482, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
... variety of topoic too. As a result, it create large diversity for all users. The prof...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1373.03311258 154% => OK
No of words: 384.0 270.72406181 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50260416667 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0568394072 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544270833333 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 419.366225166 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2583228752 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 63.6247240618 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.