During the first week, volunteers continued to take their usual sleeping medication. They slept soundly but wakened feeling tired. At the beginning of the second week, the volunteers discontinued their sleeping medication. During that week, they slept less soundly than the previous week and felt even more tired. During the third week, the volunteers slept longer and more soundly than in the previous two weeks. Therefore, the study proves that lavender cures insomnia within a short period of time.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author of the statement above assumes that the scent of lavender is proved to be the cure for insomnia. This conclusion is based on an experiment conducted on 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia. The statement lacks several vital evidences to lead us to the make same conclusion as the author’s does.
First, the author needs to provide evidence showing the length of the patients sleep was enough. What mentioned in the statement informs us that they slept soundly, but there is no evidence to answer how long their sleep pattern was. It is possible that the length of their sleep has never reached the sufficient time that they felt tired.
Speaking of tiredness, secondly, the author did not mention the amount of feeling tired at the end of the experiment. Even if the volunteers slept soundly and long, they might still be tired. Then there is still a problem with such a curing system. Sleeping is supposed to provide energy for people, the mere process of sleeping is not enough if the patient who wakes up is too tired to begin the day energetically.
Thirdly, the author needs to provide evidence which shows that the treatment works without medications more than a mere two-week period. Assuming that all of the results were proven that this method is effective, the insomnia might relapse after the two weeks of the experiment. Thus, in order to show that the cure effectively deracinates insomnia, the author needs to assess this method in more than a two-week period.
Finally, the experiment is conducted on 30 individuals with chronic insomnia. The author needs evidence showing us that in this experiment a comprehensive range of insomniac patients is involved. Although all the volunteers had chronic insomnia, the intensity of their symptoms is not known. It is highly possible that their responses to lavender scents are different from those that have acute insomnia. Furthermore, what is the ethnicity of the volunteers? What is the range of ages in that experiment? The sex of volunteers is also important. With each of the parameters in the experiment differing from the other people outside the experiment, the conclusion cannot be generalized.
In short, there are several vital evidences without which the statement fails to be persuasive. The enumerated evidence would change the author’s current argument having equivocal conditions to a clear one. Then the argument can be evaluated.
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 67
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric powercompany. "Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appli 60
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 70
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.(3) 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by theirContemporaries. 70
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK
argument 4 -- over argued
flaws:
The essay topic is not complete. read a good sample with complete essay topic:
http://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/folk-remedy-insomni…
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 398 350
No. of Characters: 1974 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.467 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.96 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.627 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.923 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.542 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.284 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5