Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style effective.Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Nowadays the employees who excel from others with their personal abilities and success in their work are motivated by chiefs and awarded by giving extra money or other incentive payments. Some people are of the opinion that it can strongly motivate them while others completely ignore this statement and point out that it can have a negative effect on others. Personally, I believe that this style of management cannot impact so negatively as some people consider, but before drawing a quick conclusion this statement needs to be discussed.
First of all, we can acknowledge that as everyone else,...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-08-07 | moman_1031 | 50 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 75
- Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 70
- Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style effective Are the 85
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 77
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1443 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.7 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.621 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.194 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5