The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table illustrating data related to the underground railway systems in six cities.
At first glance, in terms of size, London system ranks first being 394km, to be more specific, as twice large as the second biggest system situated in Paris, which is 199km. Those systems are followed by the subway systems of Tokyo, Washington DC, Los Angeles and Kyoto, who have relatively 155, 126, 28 and 11km of routes. When it comes to the number of annual passengers, London, Paris and Tokyo systems are significantly ahead of the systems in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles. (Accordingly 775mln, 1191mln and 1927mln clients vs. 144mln, 45mln and 50mln clients).
It is also visible that, the oldest underground railway system belongs to London (1863), while the youngest one is located on Los Angeles (2001). At that point, Paris (1900), Tokyo (1927), Washington (1976) and Kyoto (1981) systems hold middle positions.
To sum it up, taking all the information into account, it can be concluded that, older subway systems are both larger and busier in comparison with the younger ones.
- Some people feel the responsibility for providing education should be borne only by the government and that private education should be banned 68
- The graph shows the unemployment rates in the us and japan between march 1993 and march 1999. 80
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 65
- The pictures below show how someone can be tracked using an electronic tracking device. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 85
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 85
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 864 1000
No. of Different Words: 113 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.8 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.414 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 18 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.69 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.418 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.692 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4