Recently, the phenomenon of T1 and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing controversy. Although contested by many that the matter of N1 is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N2 can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial issues of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, T2 can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of N3, as well as N4, are inextricably bound up. This criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. According to my empirical evidence, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered N5. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N6 and N7 apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, had there been a paradigm shift earlier, T3 might increase the consequences of N8. Likewise, fundamental aspects of N9 could relate to this reality that the demerits of N10 pertain to N11. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N12 is correlated negatively with N13. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N14.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, without the slightest doubt, I profoundly believe that the benefits of T4 far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of N15 prove the significance of N16, but also pinpoint N17 problems.
Recently, the phenomenon of T1 and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing controversy. Although contested by many that the matter of N1 is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N2 can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial issues of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, T2 can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of N3, as well as N4, are inextricably bound up. this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. According to my empirical evidence, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered N5. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N6 and N7 apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, had there been a paradigm shift earlier, T3 might increase the consequences of N8. Likewise, fundamental aspects of N9 could relate to this reality that the demerits of N10 pertain to N11. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N12 is correlated negatively with N13. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N14.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, without the slightest doubt, I profoundly believe that the benefits of T4 far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of N15 prove the significance of N16, but also pinpoint N17 problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssues of that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, T2 can provide...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th N6 and N7 apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, had there b...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sume the preconceived notion of N14. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.256 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19550684556 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8436292637 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328024185294 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996831568654 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199220931815 0.071462118173 279% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195532792664 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.29371046967 0.0609392437508 482% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.