Many people believe that its better to learn something in a group rather than individually.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people often argue that group study is more effective than studying alone for better understanding. I strongly agree with this statement because learning in a group promotes sharing of ideas and long term memory. However, an individual cannot focus completely on his work.
First of all, group study is considered to be one of the most fruitful method of learning, as this type of study involves a number of people and they interact among themselves, sharing different views and opinions about a certain topic.For example: In a class a group of 5 students were given an assignment while other students were told to do the same work alone.In a comparison, group work was proved to have best performance rather than individual work, this was because pupils generated new ideas and viewpoints, learned from each other. Therefore, learning in a grouo is far more effective than studying individually.
Secondly, group work directly helps for a long term memory. In many countries, schools and universities have started asystem of grouo study. When learners work in a mass they tend to gain knowledge practically and this leads to the memorization for a longer period of time. This type of study method may also involve demonstration, simulation and many other audio and visual aids that promoted the learning capabilities.
However, on the other hand, this type of learning system can cayse disturbances and conflict of ideas. The viewpoints of different people maynot match in sameway and this will create confusion.learners mightnot focus completely on their work or study. Likewise, one uncooperative member in a group can also affect the learning environment of others.
In conclusion, group study helps in generation of new ideas and sharing of different opinions that helps in memorization of materials for a longer period of time but can affect an individually in concentrating or being attentive towards their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arning, as this type of study involves a number of people and they interact among...
^^^
Line 8, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of people and they interact among themselves, sharing different views and ...
^^
Line 8, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...iews and opinions about a certain topic.For example: In a class a group of 5 studen...
^^^
Line 8, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nts were told to do the same work alone.In a comparison, group work was proved to ...
^^
Line 8, column 410, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
... a comparison, group work was proved to have best performance rather than individual work...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 259, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... leads to the memorization for a longer period of time. This type of study method may also inv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 148, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... memorization of materials for a longer period of time but can affect an individually in conce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 178, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('individually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('in') instead of another adjective.
... a longer period of time but can affect an individually in concentrating or being attentive toward...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28064516129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97028117176 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538709677419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 124.066359415 49.4020404114 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165900896125 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638313211268 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448564744703 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961210942056 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488191001097 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.