A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons from your own experience and examples where relevant.
In a view of animals, there is a debatable issue about exploitation. Some people believe that animals should not be exploited because of their moral rights as human beings; conversely, others argue that they must be used to meet human demands. From my standpoint, animals should be employed for both food and scientific purposes; however, they ought to be exploited proportionately and treated morally.
On the one hand, using animals, especially in food and science, is completely reasonable. In terms of the food chain, animals are below humans; thus, employing animals for human nutrients is logical as a way to make sure the balance in ecosystem. If some animals such as chicken thrive overly, they will impact negatively on the environment due to spreading virus from their bodies. In a view of science, animals play the significant role in researching new methods for dangerous diseases. Indeed, treatments investigated by trial applications on animals have cured countless patients.
On the other hand, proportionate employment and moral behavior on animals is extremely essential. These days, hunting wild species has been higher than ever and contributes to extincting few animals. Thus, animals should be exploited reasonably for conservation. Returning to animal rights, we should respect their lives because they not only are living creatures but also have feelings as humans. In fact, Switzerland's government had applied the new policy for processing lobsters that we must use tranquilizer drugs before killing them.
On balance, although there are myriad opinions about using animals for human purposes, I believe that employing animals is radical because of its benefits but it should be controlled in proportion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, so, thus, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46096654275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91985131626 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7969596957 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468192031176 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149066451516 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112639880729 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289507925754 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752464397979 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.