A strong ability to be cooperative and work with others is more valuable than a strong ability to lead others. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is hard to deny that developing the ability to lead others seems to be beneficial to people's future career path, and such an opinion may lead impressionable people to generate the idea that the ability to lead others is more valuable. However, as far as effectiveness, mental health, and leadership are concerned, I strongly hold that we should develop our ability to cooperate with others instead of leading others.
First of all, being a cooperative person can enhance the efficiency in communication with academic group members or coworkers. To be more specific, listening to other's ideas carefully and being willing to accept others opinion are typical ways to show your repect to others and your attitude to cooperate, which can help aviod severe conflict and promote the project keep on going smoothly.
Furthmore, the fact that being a leader is energy consuming indicates leadership is harmful for one's mental health. Take my friend Michelle, a group leader in tech company, for example: Michelle is a new leader responsable for a group of eight, and she always need to work overnight to make up for the mistakes that her group member created, which tired her up and eventurally lead her to resign the job and looking for help from psychologist. Had it not been accepting the tiring leading role, Michelle would not have fallen into such depressing situation.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that people who do not possess the ability to lead will never gain promotion in their career. Ironically, one should only learn how to cooperate before he/she learn how to lead. If a person want to be a leader; firstly, he need to gain respect from his group members, and the fundamental way to won others' respect is to be cooperative. In other words, you need to be cooperative before becoming a leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e conflict and promote the project keep on going smoothly. Furthmore, the fact that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
...ly learn how to cooperate before he/she learn how to lead. If a person want to be a l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, for example, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95081967213 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74286546114 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.466068285 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.272727273 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304913774291 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112958636984 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843648268555 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189928415167 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110279940198 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.