The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the Multilanguage ability has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, “what are the positive and negative consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held view that ability to learn several languages is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the linguistical standpoint, mono language is bound up inextricably with communication, which indicates they lead to booth merits and demerit. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and localization crisis as well as an exponential increase in academic achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the ability to learn more than one language is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of social science, without the slightest doubt, efficient training systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, native language, and dominant language. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take communication improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint learning language problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to bilingual, language learner, and even dead language. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that learning more than one language is of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92657342657 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47421040008 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.949834635 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185138619386 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527255528447 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635593824951 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105916238383 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379674107637 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 24.0 9.94827586207 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.