The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Expressing your thoughts in different languages is a sign of the smart people. Where a significant number of people think that learning more than one language is less important in the future, others believe that it is not like this. Consequently, it becomes a moot question. I strongly disagree with the notion and will elucidate further to support my answer using the required examples and arguments.
There are myriads of reasons why knowledge of different languages can help you to grow not only personally but professionally as well. The preponderant one is that it will allure an individual to experience different cultures. In order to understand, the culture and history of any religion or the nation, one must understand their basic language so that their scriptures and other wordings can be read. Moreover, multi-language helps the youngster to grow professionally as well. However, an individual feels more comfortable while speaking and expressing his thoughts in their native or mother-tongue. For instance, enormous companies required people for the trades and discussion with their clients so that they can understand their need in details.
Another pivotal point is that it is benefited for the tourists as well who always ready to travel to the different countries. Different languages can help them to augment an open discussion with local residents and as a result, they can get more information about the city where they will travel and it will save their pocket as well to hire a guide.
In conclusion, on the basis of above-mentioned points, one can conclude that it will be a great feeling to learn a new language which adds flying colors in their personality and importance of language will never jeopardize in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books? Agree or disagree? 77
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 84
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 85
- What are adventures sports? Should these banned or not? 55
- some people believe more money and less time is better while some believe more time and less money is better discuss both view points 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tance of language will never jeopardize in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98555007065 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7026659614 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274414144365 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895964347374 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098061980442 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185374269206 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922181055129 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.