The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue, on the importance of acquiring more than language in the future, can lead to thought-provoking discussions. Irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I have a mixed opinion in this case based on some facts.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, language is the important key for humans, and it eases the communications between the different countries. It is also important to note that when a new medical research is published in a certain language, people are interesting to understand it on its native language. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that without knowing the different languages, we cannot be improved.
As ever coin has two sides, the language importance in the future is associated with other thoughts. First and foremost, the electronic devices are well developed by several companies, and they are loaded with sufficient translation applications. While, people travel abroad, they can use those applications to communicate with the inhabitants. This exemplifies that recent technologies assist people in the communication with others.
In Conclusion, there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that we cannot judge on the importance to acquire new language, unless we define the situation we are in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new medical research'.
Suggestion: new medical research
... It is also important to note that when a new medical research is published in a certain language, peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s we define the situation we are in.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48230088496 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24376121858 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9910459968 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.636363636 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126695376978 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416737897152 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574153331722 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721227853516 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495133353841 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.