Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, air travel has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "is air travel proper for affluent people?" Although some individuals argue that ordinary man cannot take advantage from the air travel, I tend to believe that both the low income and wealthy humans benefit from the airplane.
From a environmental and econimic point of view, air travel is indeed bound up closely with affluent people, which means it might lead to both middle class man and rich individuals. For example, a group of reputable economists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between air pollution and economy tickets. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that traveling by plane is correlated positively with people from all walks of life.
In economic terms, the development of air travel is undoubtedly attributable to earnings of citizens. A well-known example of such attributions is low price tickets, which are cause for concern since it had been mistaken to take affordable tickets for granted. Had they provided passengers, it might have had the opportunity to save money. Thus, travelling by plane could play a significant role in providing convenience.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that poor and high income men could take advantage from air traveling. However, as every garden may have some seeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, air travel has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 6, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...humans benefit from the airplane. From a environmental and econimic point of vie...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4512195122 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04317370628 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654471544715 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0082687925 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237811020347 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843880600927 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803155011501 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137107035519 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080388825812 0.0609392437508 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.94827586207 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.