Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, topical issue of luxury lifestyle has provoked a heated debate. Although objected by many, it is a widely held view that this lifestyle can develop self-sufficient and active individuals. Providing further statistics, I will present a convincing argument before reaching a logical conclusion.
From a socioeconomic standpoint, the alarming trend of financial accumulation may commonly breed strong greed. This feeling emerges essentially because the more people earn, the more they feel inadequate, and the more they strive to hoard materials, which further enslave them. Had there been less materialistic society, the generality of people could have relished the prospects of simple, yet enjoyable, lives. As a few notable examples of such Mammon, the avarice for luxurious automobiles, extravagant clothes, and fancy parties or trips, amongst youths, can be cited.
Furthermore, without the slight doubt, the care-free attitude of people attributes principally to this extravagant lifestyle, in that people tend to become indolent. Not only will people be disincentivized from making progress educationally, but they also will progressively become inactive and self-centered persons, while being dismissive of others and ethical values. The concrete evidence of the desire for wealth derives originally from an extensive survey conducted in Norway in 2016, with establishing a particularly close correlation between the material abundance and antisocial behavior patterns.
In conclusion, the prevalence of materialism seems bound up inextricably with present-day lifestyles in culture and may create antisocial habits as long as they are not appropriately modified. Thus, it is my main contention that current shift in values would on no account bring about self-sufficient as well as robust personalities. However, it seems that the further we research, the more we discover, with the benefit of hindsight.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90714285714 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38079811855 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703571428571 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 9.0 1.56157635468 576% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9119300993 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156981270651 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455564941835 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276659242685 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081447972512 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031534961241 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.