Essay topics:
ATM machines
The lecture was about problems related to ATM machine, which comprised forgetting cards as well as forgetting money. The spokesperson described England banks, and the fundamental essence of taking cards first emphasized the significance of Taking money first. Ultimately, although both collecting money and having access to the bank account could be inferred from being less likely to forget cards and money, the corresponding impacts of complains were acknowledged.
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: ATM_MACHINE[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant ('M' stands for 'machine'). Use simply 'ATM'.
Suggestion: ATM
...e lecture was about problems related to ATM machine, which comprised forgetting cards as we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 20.9802955665 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 31.9359605911 25% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 398.0 1207.87684729 33% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 69.0 242.827586207 28% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76811594203 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.8821214171 3.92707691288 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96425530172 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 52.0 139.433497537 37% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.753623188406 0.580463131201 130% => OK
syllable_count: 117.9 379.143842365 31% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 12.6551724138 24% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8182789432 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.25397266985 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.045689537578 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349170577806 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493801766715 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045689537578 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 55.0591133005 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.