Recently, a debate regarding the benefits and drawbacks of learning old theater literacy has become groundswell across our education system. It is likely that many literacy researchers would promote old theater plays for art cultivation. However, many managers of business companies doubt that it would be inconsistent with modern lifestyles and what society needs. The following essay would further elaborate both sides in detail with examples.
To begin with, the prime benefit old dramas and novels help the students be aware of traditions, customs, rituals, and lifestyle of people of bygone centuries. For example, tragedies created by the great playwright Shakespeare, propelling the students back to the 16th century, in order to learn the contradiction of psychology and actions between people from different level of the society. Not only is it helpful for the students to build a habit of critical thinking, but it also prevent the past mistakes from reappearing by the students. On the other hand, old dramas played on the stage of the theater could be great practice of students for building up their confidence towards massive audience, for example, by enhancing their tone of voice during the speech. Other elements such as dancing and singing also cultivate the ability of students regarding the expression of emotions and passion. In this case, the valuable, precious human heritage could be preserved while those outdated beliefs, customs or rituals which do more harm than good would be avoided.
On the flip side, the old narratives of art forms such as dramas and plays of the theater is contrast with the requirements of modern society. Students in high schools who are confronted with the future competition in either academic study or professional fields. For example, the modern job market requires a lot in operating modern technologies, teamwork and leadership. Youngsters paying too much attention towards those romantic or tragic forms of literature will be considered as detachment of the modern society, and thus, impede them from integrating into the work force.
In a nutshell, studying literature does more good than harm for the students, as long as it is well guided by our teaching system, and well balanced in the modern living style.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevents'?
Suggestion: prevents
...habit of critical thinking, but it also prevent the past mistakes from reappearing by t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1207.87684729 159% => OK
No of words: 363.0 242.827586207 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28374655647 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75450411401 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 139.433497537 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586776859504 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0107996774 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.866666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177711010175 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613611838207 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587933100076 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103363351001 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593687302363 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.