It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Providing our era with new inventions that are constantly being renovated is always a debatable topic. Even though, many people complained that in today’s life new technologies are leading people to an unhealthy way of life. Others reject this notion and argue that such new creations like mobile handsets meet people’s desire of needs. In this case, further elaboration of both sides of the benefits and loss will be discussed in the following essay and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, new inventions could be a threat for children and teenagers to form the correct living habits. For example, computer gaming as an evolving industry has kept promoting the idea of virtual immersion to the kids. As a consequence, instead of going outside and meet friends in the physical world, kids or even adults are now more likely to stay at home, playing video games with their friends online. These changing ways of life discourage people from building their abilities of social networking and communication. Not to mention that spending too much time on a computer screen is even harmful for people’s sight.
On the flip side, new things being invented everyday have practically solved issues within our daily work. For instance, labors involving heavy and repeating processes could be benefit from using the machine. As a result, not only could the company save a lot of funds in massive production but it also decrease the chance of defective product to be produced.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the continuous emerging of new things are key to propel the development of our society. In a nutshell, the disadvantages could be negligible with the huge benefits of which these inventions brought to us.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that preservation of our ancient architectures are the key to protect our historic culture. In a nutshell, the expense could be negligible with the huge benefits of which these buildings brought to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...he flip side, new things being invented everyday have practically solved issues within o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...funds in massive production but it also decrease the chance of defective product to be p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 336.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16964285714 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92362962598 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6105447849 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11631721885 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400054103822 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03347713488 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671019129633 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233718887738 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.