Whether experimental learning can work well in formal learning, agree or disagree?
Providing formal education with more experimental learning rather than traditional paper based education is always a debatable topic. In fact, many people claim that in today’s job market, graduates with more practical experience often have more advance than those who are with high marks in exams. The following essay agrees with the statement and will further elaborate the reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the traditional paper based education requires students to analyze questions based on the theoretical knowledge learnt through books, lectures and online materials. However, students without enough experimental learning are often less favorable in the labor market. As a consequence, introducing experimental learning courses is a necessity in formal education. It is projected that about 20% graduates have problem with finding a job. Only have a pretty transcript of grades is no longer considered as a strength but many employer are seeking for more other skills such as teamwork, social networking and so on.
On the flip side, if a graduate choose to become a scholar with his major, a different story will be that he might not need a strong skill of communication or teamwork. In that situation, experimental learning could be less valuable compared to traditional paper based learning.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that experimental learning provides huge benefits in formal learning. In a nutshell, it brings graduates with more working opportunities and social skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employer seems to be countable; consider using: 'many employers'.
Suggestion: many employers
... no longer considered as a strength but many employer are seeking for more other skills such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51239669421 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03995208084 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623966942149 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.998456757 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192226218117 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801782296141 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087130248765 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130912862325 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687623974637 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.