It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Providing the ancient buildings with proper preservation without any consideration of the expense is always a debatable topic. Even though, many people complained that in today’s life beautiful buildings from the past are disappearing with the advance of times. Others reject this notion and argue that such old buildings should be reconstructed to modern facilities that could be more useful for citizens. Further elaboration of both sides of the statement will be discussed in the following essay and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, buildings from the past could be tourist attractions that help appeal travelers from all over the world. As a consequence, more jobs related to travelling are created. Architectures such as royal palaces, ancient temples and magnificent monuments are not only an attraction that increases jobs and incomes of a country but also are human’s cultural heritage. Meanwhile, without historic buildings, it would be difficult for our children to learn their own culture.
On the flip side, expense of maintaining the old buildings are criticized by some people. Correspondingly, they denied spending their taxes on these old architecture. The reason is that high expense are required in order to perform regular check and frequent repair. However, a positive consequence is that professionals in the field of historic buildings gained their careers.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that preservation of our ancient architectures are the key to protect our historic culture. In a nutshell, the expense could be negligible with the huge benefits of which these buildings brought to us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50957854406 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14693994468 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8074529882 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204993270596 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647106374874 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536226447205 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118072381152 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061234365126 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.