One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in preserving the beautiful monuments of past. There is a widespread concern that some people argue it is just a waste of money and time for taking care of the old buildings but the proponents argue on it. In my opinion, the old beautiful buildings are very important to us so I agree with the statement.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the beautiful old buildings let us know the civilization of the past. In fact, not only do these structures show us the art and culture but also the way people used to live in that era. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that even it is very expensive to preserve those buildings, it is a University for all the people. Needless to say, all these merits stand the importance of the beautiful buildings in good stead, as far as the historical part is considered.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that we have to spend the myriad amount of money to keep as they were. Besides, it will also prevent from doing scientific developments for new generations. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that in Nepal, the old buildings and the narrow roads are not letting the city to grow into metro city developments. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the protection of old buildings.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of the beautiful old buildings for the upcoming generations are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66551724138 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73800269167 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3351490372 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223328418334 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761651201193 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607660940005 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123211925947 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671236643454 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.