One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in increasing the number of shootings. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, people having guns at home has more negative impacts than positives in the society.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefit of having guns at home makes us feel safe and fearless. For example, villagers unlike in the past, now feel safe from being looted at remote villages, as they don't need to be awake at nights to protect themselves and their property, thanks to new weapons.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that keeping guns at home has negative consequences for children who can misuse in various ways. Firstly, people in America misuse the guns to kill for even small conflict, such as school children shooting their classmates. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of shooting assassination has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of crime has increased because of people having easy access to the strong weapon gun.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of USA is taking great initiatives to educate its nationals against negative impact of keeping guns at home. Citizens are being encouraged not to keep guns at home, to avoid any upcoming accidents.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of keeping guns at home in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eing looted at remote villages, as they dont need to be awake at nights to protect t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94306049822 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66675584422 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580071174377 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1439979472 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217469320741 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794259574324 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503692908566 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123048656832 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241341471639 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.