One of the most conspicuous debates of today's world is the design of the buildings. There is a widespread worry that some support the statement that the building's design has a positive impact on people's life and work but proponents are against it. In my opinion, the way the building is constructed really affects the life and work both positive and negatively.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that well-facilitated buildings make people's life and work very easy and run smoothly. In fact, not only do well-architected buildings save time but also money. For instance, the lifts in a well-designed skyscraper in Australia makes people reach to the top of the 80'th floor within 35 seconds with very less effort. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the positive impact of people's life and work in good stead, as far as the building's design is considered.
On the other hand, the detrimental aspect of this argument is that people will west their hard time of life by collecting a lot of money to build designed buildings. Besides, a poor person can never think of constructing well-facilitated buildings, means they will never have a good life and work. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that the majority of people living in the slum area of India are found involved in criminal activities. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the positiveness in their life and work because of building design.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of the design of buildings provide the positive impact on people's life and work are indeed too great to ignore.
- Is increase tourism beneficial or harmful to the local culture ? Give your opinion. 85
- In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- "Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 88
- A competitive environment in school and university would bring excellence and need to be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 70
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, really, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86394557823 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81444447285 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.930491985 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460838588855 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178984171375 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10819630549 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307062648581 0.151781067708 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333129262044 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.