One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge for the usage of over-packaged products. There is a widespread concern that some people say the consumers should avoid such products but the proponents argue it is the responsibility of the producers to avoid extra packaging. In my opinion, the second statement outdo the first and merits serious considerations.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the producers of the product must avoid packing them extra. In fact, not only do over-packaging make consumers bear more cost than actual but also it is very harmful for the degradation of the environment. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that the government has to bear lot of cost for the disposal of the products used to package the products. Needless to say, all these demerits stand the economy in bad stead, as far as the harmfulness is concerned.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that the over-packaged products are very beneficial because they protect perishable goods. Besides, the goods not lasting long are very easy to make them go for long time. For example, there are a number of researches by various government bodies that show that in the USA the mirror used at wardrobe are supplied packing with thick materials to make it safely delivered. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of packing the products using extra packing materials.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the over-packaged products are not good for everyone is indeed too dare to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to dare'?
Suggestion: to dare
...cts are not good for everyone is indeed too dare to ignore.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, second, so, as to, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92142857143 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83591219173 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7827707252 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24435861981 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867024835646 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785575837645 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150980381954 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382975914994 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.