One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is there is a colossal upsurge in the design of buildings. There is a widespread worry that some people believe the design of the buildings will have a positive impact on their life and work but some proponents argue against it. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and the first outdo the last one.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the way the building is constructed and designed changes the mood of the people and creates energy in them. In fact, not only do the architecture of the building makes a good impression on others but also shows their personality. For instance, the people of Netherland are very happy and successful as they prefer to live in well-designed buildings. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the positive impacts on people's life's' in good stead.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that if a person itself is capable of running their profession and life upward, other things do not matter. The location where a person is living and the way they are grown up matters but not the concrete building. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that in Australia many successful and famous scientists live in simple buildings and locations. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the design of the building which does not affect ones' life and work.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the life and work of a successful and talented person do not get affected by the design of the building where they live and work are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted and the first outdo the last one. There are many arguments in favour of my...
^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n of the building which does not affect ones life and work. In view of the argume...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71666666667 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59976708358 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.935988423 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30809886891 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109540461629 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111595690325 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19642368684 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678062661497 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.