One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is an irrefutable debate the environment we are living is in danger due to the human activities. There is a widespread concern that some people argue the degradation of the environment is due to global warming but the proponents are against this statement. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the daily activities of human in regard to making their daily life luxurious. In fact, not only do this is degrading the environment situation but also the life of all is on the edge of a knife. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that the use of excessive uranium is making ozone layer thinner day by day. Needless to say, all these demerits stand in polluting the surrounding in bad stead, as far as the environmental condition is concerned.
In addition to this, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the government of each country must play the vital role in preventing this. Besides, not only the stakeholders of the country but also each individual must control their behaviour. For the salient example, there are myriad of researches by various government bodies that show that the people of Australia are against using uranium energy and prefer to use organic foods. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of consuming organic products.
To recapitulate, in of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the danger to the environment we live in is due to the major activities of individual desire are indeed too dare to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to dare'?
Suggestion: to dare
...ivities of individual desire are indeed too dare to ignore.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, in addition, in fact, in my opinion, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89135629766 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5064027865 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209648463511 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685091980579 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492480063215 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125684905085 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453347431237 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.