One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that it is one of the strongest topics of the debate whether effective learning requires time, comfort and peace or it is possible to study along with employment. There is a widespread worry that some people argue a genius person can do both at a time but other proponents argue it is impossible. In my opinion, both effective study and doing employment is possible.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that a laborious person can manage time for study along with his employment. In fact, not only does a person doing the job get chance to implement whatever he studies but also utilise most of the time in a day. For instance, a study by Oxford University, a student doing together employment and study are very good at utilising their time wisely. Needless to say, a person getting success in their career are doing both job and study.
On the other hand, the detrimental aspect of this argument is that a student gets tired of doing the job the whole day and is very hard for them to concentrate on the study. They are not physically sound for the study. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that a man is not mentally fit to concentrate in study after long shift work which is not good for their career. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the argument of studying and employment together.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of doing a job and study together for the career of a person are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'studies'.
Suggestion: studies
...job get chance to implement whatever he study but also use his most of the time of a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53205128205 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51020271806 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483974358974 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3272054682 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246793445658 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10995298477 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817620722886 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166504120536 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913957639009 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.5310837438 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.