One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the spending time too much on work. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, spending too much time on work has more negative impacts than positives in the society.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of giving more time for work is getting expertise on the related field. For example, Doctors, unlike in the past, now are gaining more experience, as more people are going to hospitals to cur for their disease.
On the other hand, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that giving more time for work than personal life have negative consequences for their family in various ways. Firstly, there will be very less bonding with children and wife, such as in security officer who do not know many things about his daughter. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of people working more hours only focusing in their career have increased from 10 percent to 30 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of people suffer from disease, because of less or no physical exercise.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking great initiatives in educating its nationals against the negative impacts of giving more time for work comparing to personal life. Citizens are being encouraged to balance time for both work and personal life to be healthy.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of spending more time on work in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86824324324 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56719191775 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1162966591 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.846153846 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244040372526 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093131510636 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673833109403 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145342034144 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546674902449 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.