One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that there is a colossal upsurge in being successful sports and glamorous film stars as a role model for youngsters. There is a widespread worry that most of the stars are found involved in illicit activities. We find many people either in favour or against this statement but in my opinion, the last one outdoes the first.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that people rarely get the chance to know the dark inner reality of the stars. In fact, not only do successful stars handcuffed because found involved in activities like drug trafficking, prostitution, and so on but also many are suffering from depression because of not getting to spend more time with family. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that stars are only seen shining in screens or in the field. Needless to say, all these demerits stand for stars dark shadow far-reaching.
On the other hand, one pivotal aspect of this argument is that we can see only a handful number of stars doing a really good job outside screens. For example, there are a number of researchers by various governmental bodies that show that some Hollywood actors are donating part of their earnings to the needy people all over the world. Also, youngsters are found doing big innovations as they were trying to mimic the movie part of their role model actors. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of the fact that stars being as a role model for youngsters.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the disadvantage of successful stars as the role model for younger people are indeed too dire to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, really, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76174496644 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58147930532 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2068213691 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360681358236 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133727431129 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119176364967 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223295557341 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504275030972 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.