Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that it is one of the strongest topics of the debate whether effective learning requires time, comfort and peace or it is possible to study along with employment. There is a widespread worry that some people argue a genius person can do both at a time but other proponents argue it is impossible. In my opinion, both effective study and doing employment is possible.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that a laborious person can manage time for study along with his employment. In fact, not only does a person doing the job get chance to implement whatever he studies but also utilise most of the time in a day. For instance, a study by Oxford University, a student doing together employment and a study are very good at utilising their time wisely. Needless to say, a person getting success in their career are doing both job and study.
On the other hand, the detrimental aspect of this argument is that a student gets tired of doing the job the whole day and is very hard for them to concentrate on the study. They are not physically sound for the study. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that a man is not mentally fit to concentrate in study after long shift work which is not good for their career. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the argument of studying and employment together.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of doing a job and study together for the career of a person are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54054054054 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54146583207 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483108108108 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0617817507 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251935282636 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105794068652 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880881022654 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16396003931 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954122751456 0.0609392437508 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.5310837438 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.