One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the irrefutable debate that the mass media influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. There is a widespread concern that some believe mass media is not a counterpart but the proponents are against it. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations because the first statement outdo the last ones.
To begin with, there is the deluge of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that at current world mass media is one which designs the future way. In fact, not only do the TV, radio and newspapers change the opinion but also can turn everyone as they wish. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that there is the corresponding relation between mass media and the society. Needless to say, all these merits stand the good path of society in good stead, as far as bright future is concerned.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is the negative news and programs of the mass media destroy the human life. Besides, they are also able to keep the world in their hand. For the salient example, there are myriad of researches by various government bodies that show that the Australian election is largely affected by the pre-polling result of media. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the mass media.
To recapitulate, in view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of mass media is very influential for the shake of the society are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79496402878 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61970541806 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2225346318 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.083333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288489701261 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935991038118 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103980151296 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160313740896 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105196497583 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.