Should companies which sell clothes, or consumer goods put their emphasise on reputations or short-term strategies like discounts and special offers?

Essay topics:

Should companies which sell clothes, or consumer goods put their emphasise on reputations or short-term strategies like discounts and special offers?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge of companies putting emphasis on reputations or short-term strategies. There is a concern that some people say businesses should focus on goodwill but proponents are against this. In my opinion, reputation is very important for the business companies which outdo short-term strategies.

There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that consumer goods must be of good value to the consumers. In fact, not only do big companies like Apple and Samsung provide quality products but also they never compromise on attracting customers with discounts or special offers. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that a reliable customer of the company is gauged on the basis of the recurrence. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the long run of the company in good stead, as far as quality product is considered.

On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that the sales of the product after offers like discount cannot gauge the regular customers. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that many consumers buy the products having offers only who cannot be a customer of one regular company. Besides, this cannot help to speculate on the regular sales of the company. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the discounts and special offers.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of putting emphasis on reputation by the company instead of the special offer as short-term strategies are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01433691756 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71974764887 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3791062583 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.583333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308525225821 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101350959605 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719907826172 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182147748079 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610095582478 0.0609392437508 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.