The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the claim of animals having rights being as a matter of debate. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, the claim of zoos are helping animals has more negative impacts than positives in the society.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefit of is the endangered animals can be protected with 24/7 care. For example, Polar bears, unlike in the past, now have been kept in zoos and protected, as in the past they were not protected in closed circuits.
On the other hand, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that protecting endangered animals in zoos have negative consequences for animal themselves in various ways. Firstly, they will never get go know their natural habitat and their community, such as vultures inside a boundry of zoos will not get chance to interact with other animals or birds. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of preserving animals in zoos have been reduced from 31 per cent to 13 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of ecosystem is being disturbed, because of this environment gets polluted.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Nepal is taking a great initiatives to educate its people against the negative impact of keeping animals in zoos. Citizens are being informed to protect the endangered animals and birds, to maintaining the eco-system.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of keeping animals in the zoos are indeed too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t one of the most significant benefit of is the endangered animals can be protect...
^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'initiative'?
Suggestion: initiative
...e government of Nepal is taking a great initiatives to educate its people against the negat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92542372881 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69783660016 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552542372881 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7208609239 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326987177055 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11123263464 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784194410091 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176143295671 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648207686857 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.