The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
Animals in zoos looks extremely fascinating and attractive but It has been argued from long time that animals are also have some rights and they belong to certain place like jungles and should not be kept in the zoos. I believe, by keeping animals in zoos, we are hurting them in place of helping them. I will discuss further in this essay that zoos are hurting animals instead of helping them and will elaborate why zoos should be banned.
Firstly, animals in zoos are away from their home. Jungle is there home, and that is where they behave in their true way. But, in zoos we isolate them from lots of things which they can have in jungle. Though we provide them food on time, but they are not free to go anywhere. We bound them to one place and hence we can say that we are hurting them instead of helping them.
Secondly, zoos have become a popular tourist place. Zoo owners earn money from zoo but they do not provide facilities to animals as per their need. We heard news of dying animals due to diseases so many times. Animals diseases can be treated with the money they make by entertaining people. But they do not get such perks in the zoos. So, there is not benefits for the animals in the zoos.
To sum up, zoo is not animals place, we are hurting them by keeping them in zoos and zoos should be banned as they are not capable of taking care of animal’s needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ed from long time that animals are also have some rights and they belong to certain ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, look, second, secondly, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37596899225 5.00649968141 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0807312035 2.71678728327 77% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8567557088 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2666666667 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347852277959 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132450316661 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10860657711 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266658983385 0.151781067708 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114238666938 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 12.6369458128 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.1260098522 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.5310837438 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.32886699507 79% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 55.0591133005 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.