Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society.
Recently, the phenomenon of new invention of social media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it's usage for the society is beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that connecting people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, invention of different social media can provide connections to each other with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a University student, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered current inventions. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of this phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
With the realm of public arena, fake identity created in these social sites might increase the consequences of critical issues. As far as the society is concerned, the ultimate aim of these inventions is to know every related person's personal and professional details. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious University has asserted that the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is logical to assume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of facebook, wechat, and so on outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of keeping the attachment with loved ones prove the significance of recent inventions, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
Recently, the phenomenon of new invention of social media and its corresponding i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57249070632 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18047066506 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7864523885 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069863779892 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223599541417 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291938812478 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391979505041 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164367779042 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.